题　名  论侵占罪  
作　者  邓斌  
作者单位  吉林大学,法学院,长春市 130012  
专　业  刑法学  
指导教师  吴振兴  
学位级别  303  
馆藏索取号  3990411  
中文文摘  侵占罪是新刑法设立的新罪名，因此有关研究尚很匮乏。然而司法实践中不断出现各种问题，为要善解决这些问题，就必须对侵占罪的理论及实践进行研究。本文是一篇系统深入研究侵占罪的学术论文。全文共分三部分:侵占罪的构成；侵占罪的认定；侵占罪立法的缺陷及完善。
论文第一部分是本文的重点，以较大篇幅详尽地阐述了侵占罪的主体要件、主观要件、客观要件、客体要件。在评价学界诸说的基础上，作者指出侵占罪的主体要件为特殊主体，即只有代为保管人、埋藏物发现人、遗忘物拾得人方可构成本罪。通过分析所有权地位没落这一现状，作者对“侵犯财产罪的同类客体为所有权”这一传统观点提出了质疑，认为侵犯财产罪的同类客体品物权，侵占罪的客体也是物权。另外，还就侵占罪客观方面中的“拒不退还”、“拒不交出”等问题的理解提了自己的一些见解。
论文第二部分从罪问界限及犯罪形态两个方面论述了侵占罪的认定，立足司法实践，力求为准确认定侵占罪提供妥当的理论依据。在罪间界限中，详细考察了侵占罪与盗窃罪、诈骗类罪、职务侵占罪、窝藏赃物罪、故意毁坏财物罪、盗掘类罪的界限,提供了一些切实可行的区分标准。在犯罪形态中则主要研讨了罪数形态及未完成形态问题。对司法实践中可能出现的罪数问题一一作了分析，并提出了具体的处理意见。通过充分论证，作者指出，侵占罪不存在可罚的未完成形态。
论文第三部分指出了侵占罪立法的诸多缺陷。寻求安善立法的具体途径。立法不可能绝对完备，侵占罪立法就至少存在下述五大缺陷:用语不导慎、主体缺失、行为泛化、罚则模糊、自诉困窘。其中有些是技术上的失误,有的则是理解上的偏差。作者指出,“保管”及“遗忘物”属用语不慎,应分别易为“持有”及“遗失物”,“非法占为己有”应设定为主观要件,将“侵吞”视为本罪行为要件。此外，对新刑法第270条的完善也提出了大胆的设想。

英文文摘  Embezzlement is a new crime in the Criminal Law of China Revised in 1997. Therefore, the research on it is deficient. To handle the problems emerging from judicial proceedings mote research on Embezzlement is necessary. The thesis makes a systematic and deep research on Embezzlement. It is composed of three parts: the constitutional of Embezzlement, the identification of Embezzlement, the defects and development of Embezzlement.
The first part is the focal point in this thesis which gives detailed research on Subject of Embezzlement, subjective Aspects of Embezzlement, Objective Aspects of Embezzlement and Objective of Embezzlement. Based on evaluating the different ideas about Subject of Embezzlement, the author holds that Subject of Embezzlement IS Special. Crime Subject, that is, only the custodian, lost finder and hidden wealth finder can be the Subject of Embezzlement. The author also takes a doubt about the traditional opinion that the Common Object of Property Crime is Ownership. After analyzing the weakness of ownership in civil Law, the author puts forward that the Common Object of property Crime and Object of Embezzlement are not Ownership but Jus in rem. In Objective Aspects of Embezzlement, there are some new ideas about comprehension of "refusing to return" and "refusing to surrender".
The second part discusses the identification of Embezzlement in two sides the differences between Embezzlement and other crime, the number of crime. To-identify Embezzlement exactly the author focuses his mind on the differences between Embezzlement and some similar crime including Larcery. Professional Embezzlement, Furtum Ablatum and Intentionally Destroying property. The part also contains the elaboration about the number of Crime and the resolutions of all difficulties. Based on the efficient demonstration, the author holds that Embezzlement hasn''t inchoate crime.
In the last part, the author points out some defects in the legislation of embezzlement and provides some effective measures to amend it. There are five defects in the legislation including Careless in using language Vacancy of Subject of crime, Extension of criminality, Obscurity in Penalty provision and Difficulties in private prosecution.

关键词  侵占罪,构成,认定,立法缺陷,自由词  
分类标识  D924  
论文注解日期  19981215  
总页数  46P