题　名  违法性认识与故意  
作　者  刘澄宇  
作者单位  吉林大学,法学院,长春市 130012  
专　业  刑法学  
指导教师  李洁  
学位级别  303  
馆藏索取号  3990429  
中文文摘  “不知法律不赦”是一条古老的罗马法原则。然而对于违法性认识与故意的关系至今仍是众说纷纭。本文的目的就在于搞清这个问题。为此,笔者将从几个方面对此进行探讨。全文由五个部分组成。
引论部分,在确定违法性认识的基本概念之后,着重以对中国刑法学理论和大陆法系用法学理论(德、日)中有关违法性认识问题的主要学说进行简要的介绍。
第二部分,本文将探讨犯罪故意中是否应当包括行为人的自我评价内容。笔者从行为人的自由意志出发,坚持认为犯罪故意中必须包括行为人的自我评价,因为这正是出于对人是理性存在的尊重。
第三部分,在前面所得出的结论基础上,对违法性认识和社会危害性认识(正是在这两者孰应成为犯罪故意中的自我评价内容的问题上,学说争论激烈)进行比较和分析,并得出结论,违法性认识(而不是社会危害性认识)应当成为犯罪故意的认识内容。
第四部分是关于理论合理性问题的探讨。对此,笔者提出这样的观点:任何理论都只是具有相对的合理性,而这种合理性只有在一个相互竞争的理论体系中才有意义。以此为出发点,本文对有关违法性认识的几种主要理论进行了比较,为此,借助了某些科学哲学的研究模式。
同时的笔者指出,法律就是一种程序,程序正义应当优于实质正义,因而,把社会危害性认识纳入犯罪认识内容的观点是不能接受的。
第五部分,主要是对有关的各种反对理由所进行的分析和反驳。对此,我们所得出的结论是,没有哪一种反对理由可以对笔者所坚持的观点提出令人信服的质疑。

英文文摘  Ignoratia juris neminem exactas is an ancient and well-known Rome Law principle. Yet, there''s still controversies on the relation between the understanding of illegality and criminal intention. The aim of this thesis is to solve this problem. For this purpose, the author explores the issue in several aspects. The whole thesis comprises five sections.
Part one is the introduction. After defining the basic concept of understanding of illegality, some main viewpoints on this by the criminal theory in China and civil legal system such as Germany and Japan are briefly introduced.
In part two, the author discusses whether there should be the content of actors self-value in the activity of criminal intention. The author insists that since every actor has free will, the self-value must be a part of criminal intention. This is just the respect for human being as an, exist of reason.
Part three, on the base of the conclusion drew before, the author compares and analysis''s the understanding illegality and the recognition of social-harmfulness----it is just discussed hotly in the academic circle that which should be the content of self-value in the criminal intention .The author concludes that the understanding of illegality but not the recognition of social-harmfulness should be the substance of criminal intention.
Part four is the discussion on the rationality of certain theories. On this, the author raises an viewpoint that any theory is only relatively and partly rational, and this rationality has significant only when the theory is in a circumstance that several theories are striking in a system. Start from this, the author compares some main theories on understanding of illegality. For this purpose, the rationality mode in scientific philosophy is used for help.
Meanwhile, the author point out that law is just a type of procedure, the justice of procedure should be superior to the justice of substance. Therefore, it''s unacceptable to bring the recognition of social-harmfulness into the content of mens rea.
Part five is mainly the analysis and retorts the various opposite arguments. From this, we can reach the conclusion that none of these arguments can throw reasonable doubt on the standpoint to which the author holds.

关键词  违法性认识,故意,价值评价,自由词  
分类标识  D924  
论文注解日期  19981215  
总页数  59P