题　名  盗窃罪实务问题研究  
作　者  刘志强  
作者单位  吉林大学,法学院,长春市 130012  
专　业  刑法学  
指导教师  吴振兴  
学位级别  303  
馆藏索取号  3990390  
中文文摘  盗窃罪是人类历史上最古老的罪名之一,也是现代社会最常见、最多发的一种侵犯财产权利的犯罪。近年来,盗窃犯罪已呈现出一些新的特点。犯罪分子的犯罪手段和犯罪形式的选择日趋多样化,智力型犯罪不断增多；同时,犯罪分子中流窜犯罪、团伙犯罪和未成年犯罪突出。这些新情况、新特点反映当前盗窃犯罪的复杂性和严重性。我国刑法学界和司法实务界对盗窃罪的许多方面的问题进行了卓有成效的研究,但是,在知识经济时代，最常见、多发的盗窃罪同样会面临着实践中出现的新问题和理论中的新难题。因此,本文在借鉴现有成果的基础上,以新刑法实施为契机,对盗窃罪研究中的一些问题进行了重新的思考。由于本人专业知识和见识有限,论文准备时间仓促,错误之处,请导师和各位专家、同仁不吝指正。
一、 盗窃罪的犯罪对象问题
文中从盗窃罪对象的基本特征入手,探讨其共性,并进而对一些特殊对象提出自己的见解。在盗窃罪对象的基本特征中,认为盗窃罪的对象应具有以下基本特征:盗窃罪的对象,应当是能体现财产权利的、具有经济价值、可被人所控制或支配的并受法律规定限制的他方公私财物。在特殊对象的具体认定中,探讨了以下四个方面能否成为盗窃罪的对象问题:1.不动产问题；2.信息资源问题；3.“服务”问题；4.遗失物和遗忘物的问题。
二、盗窃数额问题
在文中对盗窃数额的含义及数额和数额标准在司法实践中的利弊进行了着重的探讨,并提出了自己的新的见解。在盗窃数额中，首先对盗窃数额的含义进行了分析,接着从立法意图看有利的方面,从司法实践中看这种立法形式存在的弊端；在盗窃数额的标准中,从三个方面探讨这个问题:(l)应否设立数额标准。(2)数额标准的计算；认为应规范计算方法和理顺管理体制。(3)在盗窃数额的立法中,提出了自己对于盗窃数额和盗窃数额标准问题的新的建议。
三、多次盗窃问题
文中认为这是刑法对盗窃罪所做的重大修改。并从以下几个方面研究“多次盗窃”:(一)多次盗窃的具体含义。(二)多次盗窃的具体认定，指出在司法实践中的具体认定的难度；(三)多次盗窃的处罚,指出在处罚上的问题；(四)多次盗窃的司法完善,提出从刑事政策上解决这一难题。
四、盗窃罪的行为特征问题
首先,对“秘密”的法律含义进行了界定。经过分析认为,这种法律含义不适应打击犯罪的需要。接着就“窃取”的法律含义进行了分析,认为其足以体现盗窃的客观特征。最后,分析了盗用和盗卖这两种在生活中和司法实践中出现较多,但并未在盗窃罪的理论中引起重视的犯罪形式。
五、盗窃罪的主观特征问题
首先,认为盗窃罪故意内容的含义有三层:第一,行为人明确意识到其窃取行为的对象是他人财物；第二,行为人明知其窃取行为会给他人所有或占有的财物造成损害结果,而故意置这种结果的发生于不顾；第三,行为人在其主观故意的支配下,对实现其非法占有目的的行为手段——窃取做了明确的选择。其次,探讨了“以非法占有为目的”的内容。从其基本含义出发,并对“以非法占有为目的”进行了辨析,认为“以非法占有为目的”是指行为人主观上要通过窃取行为达到非法占有的结果的希望。在目的的双重性中,指出双重目的给司法实践和刑法理论带来一系列问题,合乎逻辑的规定应该是将“以非法占有为目的”改为“意图非法占有"。最后指出:对一切不具有非法占有目的而取走公私财物的行为,不能认定为盗窃罪。
六、盗窃罪的转化
在盗窃罪的转化的构成特征中,认为盗窃罪的转化是有前提条件的,是客观特征和主观特征发生了变化。在盗窃罪的转化的具体认定中,从司法解释和司法实践出发,讨论了两种转化类型的具体认定问题。最后是对盗窃罪的转化的比较和评价,文中与其他犯罪形态进行了比较,并对其进行了评价。
七、盗窃罪的既遂问题
盗窃罪既遂的判定标准中,对中外刑法著述中的主张进行了概括,有以下八种观点:接触说、转移说、隐匿说、失控说、控制说、失控+控制说、损失说、取得说；分析其利弊后,指出第五种观点即“控制说”的合理性。并探讨对于“控制说”中“实际控制”的理解。在判定标准之我见中,提出“控制可能性”的观点,并说明理由。
八、盗窃罪与他罪界限问题
首先从犯罪对象上看与他罪界限,分别对盗窃罪与破坏交通工具罪、破坏交通设施罪、破坏电力设备罪、破坏易燃易爆设备罪和破坏广播电视设施、公用电信设施罪及盗窃、抢夺枪支、弹药、爆炸物罪的界限进行了探讨。其次从行为方式上看他罪的界限,对诈骗罪和抢夺罪进行了分析。最后从犯罪主体上看他罪的界限,对贪污罪和职务侵占罪进行了区分。

英文文摘  1. The problem of larceny''s suffer
The thesis according to the character of sufferers, study theory bonds, and draw a personal conduction. I think the sufferers of larceny have such character, the objects of larceny should be public and private belongings which have to controlled and restricted by law regulations, and also it should ye able to represent both the right of belongings and the economic value. During the concert identification of the special objects, the following four aspects have been investigated whether to be the objects of crime: 1. real estate problem; 2. information resources problem; 3. service problem; 4. the problem of losing or forgetting something.
2. The problem of larcenies amount
I have done a lot of investigations on the implication of larcenies amount and also the advantages and disadvantage of the amount standard in judicial practice, and then I''ve proposed my own ideas. As for the larcenies amount, first I analyzed its implication, and then I looked at the advantageous aspect from the point of view of the legislative intent and also many defects of the existence of legislation from the point of view of judicial practice. As for the number standard, I investigated this problem from three aspects: (1) analysis whether to set up the number standard from three aspects. (2) the method of calculation and the system of arrangement should be normalized and rationalized. (3) during the explication of perfecting the legislation and judicial practice, I put forward a new proposal about the amount and amount standard.
3. The problem of many times stealing
This is a great revision of larceny for criminal law. (1) the difference between many times stealing and habitual stealing lie in their legislative purpose and basic characteristics. (2) the concert identification of many times stealing indicates the difficulty in its judicial practice. (3) the punishment of many times stealing indication the problems of many times stealing indicates the problems of punishment. (4) to solve the difficult problem of perfecting the legislation from the penal policy.
4. The behavior formation of the larceny.
(1) The legal implication for the 搒ecret?has been defined, and it is also not suitable to the need of cracking down on crime. (2) The legal implication of 搒tealing?totally represents its objective characteristics. (3) I analyzed the crimes of embezzling, stealing and selling. These two kinds of crimes frequently exist in people''s life and judicial practice, but they don''t cause much attention on the larceny.
5. The subjective characteristics of larceny
(l) As for the intentional content of larceny, it has three levels of meanings: firstly, criminals realized clearly that its stealing objects are other'' belongings, second, criminals know clearly its stealing behavior will do harm to other''s belongings and ignore the bad result intentionally, thirdly, criminals make a choice of 搒tealing?clearly which can achieve its purpose of owning illegally under the control of its subjective attention. (2) The content of 搕he purpose of owning illegally? Firstly, basic meaning. Secondly, discrimination of the aim of unlawful own: I think it means that the person wishes to own something subjectively by the meaning of stealing behavior. In the double characters of the second purpose, it is mentioned that double purpose brought a serious of trouble to judicial practice and the theory of criminal law. The rules will conform to the actual situation if we change 搕he aim of unlawful own?into 搃ntending unlawful own. At last I point out: to all the behaviors of taking public or private wealth without the aim of unlawful own should be firmly believed as larceny.
6. The transform of the larceny
(l) The component feature of the transform of the larceny. It mentioned that transform should have conditions, changes of subjective and objective expressions took place. (2) Holding the transform of the larceny, the article discussed the detail holdings problems of the two transform types from judicial explanations and practice. (3) Compare and evaluation of the larceny transform, the thesis compared the other criminal situations and evaluated them.
7. The problem of comic larceny
(1) Standard between comic and uncomic larceny, there are lots of ideas in domestic and abroad. It has eight ideas concepted: touch idea, transform idea, hide idea, uncontrol idea, control idea, uncontrol + control idea, get idea, loss idea. After analyzing its advantage and disadvantage, I appreciated with the fifth point control idea, and also make a further understand about factual control of control idea. (2)In my opinion about control idea, the thesis put thesis put in the idea of control possibility, and to explain it.
8. The conf in between larceny and other crimes

关键词  盗窃罪,自由词  
分类标识  D924.11  
论文注解日期  19990415  
总页数  76P