题　名  论帮助犯  
作　者  唐煜枫  
作者单位  吉林大学,法学院,长春市 130012  
专　业  刑法学  
指导教师  吴振兴
学位级别  303  
馆藏索取号  3980297  
中文文摘  帮助犯是中外共同犯罪理论中相对不受重视的领域，然而其中仍不乏问题点和难点，需要有益的探讨。本文系以比较方法深入、系统研究帮助犯的相关理论，全文由五个部分组成：
在导言部分，对大陆法系的各种共同犯罪学说及其对帮助犯的有关论点作一历史性考察，以此作为后文研究的基础。
本文第一部分，首先对有关帮助犯的各种定义进行分类并一一辨析，在此基础上提出了作者本人的帮助犯概念。在阐释帮助犯性质时，对共犯从属性说与共犯独立性说逐一予以详尽评析，得出帮助犯的性质是从属性与独立性有机统一的结论。最后，分析了帮助犯的主客观方面构成，认为其构成特征体现在主观上的双重故意及客观上的以帮助行为协同实行行为和因果关系的幅员拓宽。进而主张，虚伪帮助不构成犯罪。
第二部分，结合我国刑法理论中常见的帮助犯类型，并充分吸收大陆法系尤其日本刑法中的相关理论，根据不同的标准，把帮助犯划为数种不同类型，即：有形帮助犯和无形帮助犯；事前帮助犯、事中帮助犯和事后帮助犯；间接帮助犯；承继帮助犯。其中后两者是作者从德、日刑法理论中新引进的概念，主张工国应予承认。对无形帮助犯与共谋共同正犯的关系、事中帮助犯的成立、间接帮助犯及承继帮助犯的责任范围等问题进行深入、细致的研究，在对其有关学说加以评析的基础上，阐述了作者本人的新见解。
第三部分，重点探讨了帮助犯与其它犯罪形态交叉的情况，包括帮助犯与不作为犯和帮助犯与犯罪未完成形态两部分内容。认为可以成立不作为之帮助犯、帮助不作为犯（既包括有形帮助，也包括无形帮助）、以不作为帮助不作为犯以及预备犯之帮助犯和未遂帮助犯。并对不作为之帮助犯的帮助性质、预备犯之帮助犯的性质及中止帮助犯的特殊成立条件等问题予以剖析、解说。
第四部分，以帮助犯的认定问题为核心展开研究，主张帮助犯与共同正犯的区别标准应求诸于各个犯罪的构成要件的具体规定及各案的客观情况，不存在统一的格式化标准，并提出把风行为的性质属帮助行为。同时，还对帮助犯与身份、帮助犯与实行过限，实行减少等问题进行分析、探讨。最后，在比较了各国立法的基础上，指出我国帮助犯的处罚原则是必减制，而且是具有独特含义的必减制。  
英文文摘  Accomplice is the field to which scholars pay little attention. However, there are still some questions and difficulties that need valuable researches. This thesis is a theoretical article studying accomplice by a comparative method systematically and deepgoingly. It is composed of five parts:
In the Introduction, the author examines different theories of complicity in civil law system and their arguments about accomplice historically, which is the basis of ensuing chapters.
In the first part, the author analyses the definitions of accomplice classified, on the base of which, she raises her own concept of it. When expounding the nature of accomplice, she comments on the theory of independence on complicity and that of subordination on complicity in detail, and reaches a conclusion that the quality of accomplice is the organic integration of subordination and independence. At last, after analyzing the constitution of the subjective aspect and objective aspect of accomplice, she thinks that its feature of constitution lies in not only the double intent In Its subjectivity but also widening the range of causation and coordination between aid and perpetration. And then, she proceeds to maintain that false assistance is not crime.
In the second part9 by combining the common kinds of 1 accomplice in the Chinese theories of criminal law with that in theories of civil law system, especially of Japan, the author classifies accomplice into several kinds in light of different standards. They are complice material and complice intellectual, accessary before the fact, accessary during the fact and accessary after the fact, Indirect accessary, successional accessary. Of them the latter two are introduced from the theory of civil law system, which should be accepted in China. And the author also studies the relation between complice intellectual and conspirator, tenability of accessary during the fact, and the scope of responsibility for indirect accessary and successional accessary deepgoingly and carefully. On the base of comments on the theories relative to accomplice, the author elaborates her own ideas.
In the third part, the author probes into the intersection of accomplice and the other criminal forms, which includes two parts. One is the intersection of accomplice and omission, the other is that of accomplice and inchoate crime. And she thinks such acts are criminal as accomplice of omission, accomplice to omission (including complice material and complice intellectual), accomplice of omission to omission, accomplice to preparatory crime and attempt of accomplice. She analyses the character of accomplice of omission and accomplice to preparatory crime. The author also explains the special constitutive elements of renunciation of accomplice.
In the last part of the thesis, how to define the responsibility of accomplice is the core. The author thinks that the standards of distinction between accomplice and group perpetrator lie in the concrete stipulations of constitutive elements of crime and the actual circumstances, Without identical standard. And lookout is a kind of the acts of accomplice. At the same time, she also analyses many other questions such as accomplice and status, accomplice and excessive perpetration or decreasing perpetration. At last, after comparing the stipulations of several other countries criminal law, the author maintains that the principle of penalty to accomplice in china is necessary mitigation system with distinctive implication.

关键词  帮助犯,承建帮助犯,帮助不作为犯,自由词  
分类标识  D924  
论文注解日期  19971215  
总页数  101P