题　名  反垄断法基本理论研究  
作　者  李巍  
作者单位  吉林大学,法学院,长春市 130012  
专　业  经济法学  
指导教师  张瑞萍，  
学位级别  303  
馆藏索取号  3980305  
中文文摘  市场经济是竞争的经济，缺乏竞争的市场是残缺不全的市场，同时，竞争又是有序的，无序的竞争是对现实经济的破坏。进入20世纪以来，垄断被为竞争的主要敌人，它的产生是对竞争的限制和扼杀。反垄断法应运而生，积极担负起维护市场秩序的重任。相应，随着反垄断法的日益国际化，反垄断法的理论研究工作日见重要。
本文作者针对反垄断法基本理论薄弱的现状，致力于对各国反垄断法和反垄断实践的研究，从系统论的角度去探讨反垄断法的基本问题，并使之有机地联系在一起形成完整的反垄断法理论体系，以期为我国反垄断法理论研究提出一个较为优化的模式，为我国反垄断立法提供有价值的建议。
第一章作者从反垄断法的地位出发，阐述了反垄断法所要达到的主要目标和体现出来的重要意义，同时又通过阐述反垄断法的历史发展规律，描述了未来反垄断法的国际化趋势。
第二章作者依据竞争是反垄断法判断规制对象的永恒发展尺度的原则、结合各国反垄断法关于垄断形式的规定，力排众家学说之异议，确认了“反垄断法的规制对象，即垄断状态，垄断行为，限制竞争行为。
第三章作者探讨反垄断法规制手段的问题，认为反垄断规制手段的运用主要体现在二个方面，一方面是建立反垄断法执行机构；另一方面是构建反垄断法律责任制度体系，只要二者充分地结合起来，就会铸造维护竞争规范得以实施的强力机制，对有害竞争的行为、状态和企图进行有力的制裁和打击，使之望而却步。
第四章作者探讨了反垄断法规制的程序问题。根据反垄断法既具有公法性又具有私法性的特征，阐述了反垄断法的公法救济程序和私法救济程序。
理论的研究和探索，最终的立足点应是服务于中国的反垄断立法实践，在文章的最后部分，作者提出了我国反垄断法应具备的主要内容。

  
英文文摘  Market economy is competitive economy and a market without competition is incomplete Furthermore, competition is systematic and unsystematic competition will break the actual economy. Monopoly has become an enemy of competition in 20th century. It restricts and strangles the competition. Antimonopoly law has come into being and played an active rule in maintaining the system of market economy with the internalilation of antimonopoly law, the theoretical research of antimonopoly is becoming more and more significant.
The author of this thesis devotes to the research on antimonopoly law of different countries and the practice of antimonopoly and systematically probes into the basic issues of antimonopoly and makes them an organic whole to form an integral theory of antimonopoly, which provide a better model for the study of antimonopoly theory and offer valuable suggestions to antimonopoly begislation.
This thesis mainly probes into three basic issues of antimonopoly law. First, the objects are limited by antimonopoly law. On the basis 4 the principle which competition is a eternal yardstick by which anti monopoly law judges and limits the objects, the author combines the regulations about monorotic forms in antimonopoly law of different countries and eliminates the objections of various theories and draw a conclusion that the limiting objects of antimonopoly law are monopolistic situations, monopolistic alts and the restricting competitive acts. Second, the means of antimonopoly law limits. The author thinks that the means of antimonopoly law limits is arrlied to two aspects. One is to establish the executive organizations of antimonopoly law; the other is to establish the legal responsibility system of antimonopoly law. If these two aspects are fully combined together, the effective instinction which maintains the execution of the competition normis established. This institution runishes and attacks monopolistic situations, monopolistic acts and the restricting competitive acts which are harmful to the competition. Third, the procedure of antmonopoly law limits. The procedure ensures the entity norms to be executed and is a means to serve the expected procedural justice by law. Therefore, the author puts forward the opinion that the relief procedure of the public law is faken as a primary means and the relief procedure of the private law is faken as a secondarv means according to the features of antimonopoly law the nature of public law and the nature of private law. Meanwhile, the author takes some factors into consideration for procedural justice.
The ultimate stand point of theoretical research should serve the practice of antimonopoly legislation in china. On the basis of the pre-ceding research, the author, at the end of the thesis, puts forward the main points which anti mono ply law of china should have.

关键词  垄断,反垄断法,竞争,自由词  
分类标识  D912.29  
论文注解日期  19971215  
总页数  41P